March storms leave so-so snowpack in the north and a cliffhanger on the San Joaquin River

April 1, 2020
by Lois Henry
Lois Henry

Snowpack versus water allocation

The size of California’s snowpack used to be the determining factor for water allocations from the State Water Project and federally owned Central Valley Project to farms and cities south of the San Francisco-Sacramento Delta.

Which is why some water managers are perplexed that the state and federal water allocations haven’t budged following recent storms.

Allocations remain at: 15% of contracted amounts on the SWP and 20% of contracted amounts for Class 1 water on the CVP.

At the Kern County Water Agency meeting March 26, Director Marty Milobar was frustrated that water allocations hadn’t changed.

“Snow-water content went from 46% to 64% in the northern Sierra,” he said. “That’s a big increase. I don’t see why allocations wouldn’t increase.”

To move things in that direction, a number of southern San Joaquin Valley towns and water districts sent a letter to Gov. Newsom asking the state to boost allocations from 15% to 35% of contracted amounts.

The signers noted the additional water could help with the production of food and keeping thousands of farmworkers employed during the COVID-19 crisis.

Despite significant increases to the northern snowpack, up to 73% of normal on the Sacramento River watershed above Shasta Dam, Dana Munn predicted water allocation increases will be incremental, at best.

“They’ll spoon feed us until more information comes in. We’ll probably get up to 45 or 50 percent of our contract, but it’ll be spoon fed,” he said. Munn is Kern River Watermaster and General Manager of the Shafter-Wasco Irrigation District, a CVP contractor.

“On top of snowpack, you have fish issues. They need to worry about things like the temperature below Shasta Dam and other things. It’s not just about the snowpack anymore.”

Share This: 

March wasn’t exactly miraculous this year but it did OK by California’s snowpack, bringing it from a dismal 40-ish% of average up to above 60% of average in the northern Sierras.

The bump wasn’t so great in the southern Sierras where snowpack is still at 40% to 46% of average for the Kaweah, Kern and Kings river watersheds, according to Department of Water Resources runoff forecasts compiled as of March 24. The Tule River watershed is clocking in at a dire 27% of average, according to the DWR forecast.

Meanwhile, in the center of the state, March storms left a watershed a cliffhanger on the San Joaquin River.

Per a 2006 legal settlement, the river gets more or less water for environmental “restoration flows” depending on the type of water year.

“We’re right on the knife’s edge between a critical high or dry year,” explained Peter Vorster, a hydrologist and hydrogeographer with The Bay Institute, a party to the San Joaquin River settlement agreement.

Critical flows

A critical high year is actually drier than a plain old dry year, which means the river gets less water in critical high years, per the settlement.

The goal of the restoration flows is to keep water in the San Joaquin all the way to the Merced River in order to bring back native salmon populations, which once flourished in the river. The San Joaquin was dried up in the early 1950s after Friant Dam was constructed and almost all the river water was directed to towns and farms in the south via the Friant-Kern Canal.

“In a critical high year, we’re hanging on to every drop just to keep the river connected,” Vorster said.

The river gets about 71,000 acre feet for restoration flows in a critical high year. In a dry year, it gets 155,000 acre feet — a huge increase.

To conclude the year type, the Bureau of Reclamation uses snowpack survey data, plus runoff forecasts and calculates what the unimpaired flow of the San Joaquin River would be if Friant Dam and other structures had never been built.

All of that has to add up to more than 669,000 acre feet for a dry year. As of March 20, the Bureau calculated the unimpaired flow at 670,000 acre feet, just a hair over the threshold, Vorster explained.

Dueling forecasts

At the same time, runoff forecast models by DWR and the National Weather Service are giving vastly different information. DWR is predicting about 100,000 acre feet  less runoff than NWS.

Without greater confirmation of a dry year type, the San Joaquin River Administrator has said he will manage the river’s flows as if they are in a critical high year in order to hold enough cold water at the base of the Friant Dam for salmon to get through the hot summer months, Vorster said.

Vorster and others are hoping that the April 1 physical snowpack check by DWR combined with data from the Airborne Snow Observatory (ASO)   —  along with more snow from a few incoming storms — will put the San Joaquin River watershed solidly into the “dry year” category.

Tech to the rescue

Vorster felt this kind of nail biting over how to manage key portions of the state’s water resources could be alleviated by a full commitment by the state, feds and water contractors to fund regular ASO flights.

ASO flights started as a joint project between NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and DWR using LIDAR, light detection and ranging technology, along with imaging spectrometry, to measure the depth and weight of snow across large watersheds.

The Friant Water Authority was an early participant in ASO flights, with its members chipping in to pay for regular surveys of the San Joaquin River watershed starting in 2017.

It’s not cheap at about $90,000 per flight. And it has drawbacks, such as no flights on cloudy days.

And it makes more sense for larger, more remote watersheds that don’t have adequate storage, said Kern River Watermaster Dana Munn.

In Kern County, where Isabella Lake at full capacity can store 570,000 acre feet and average runoff of the Kern River is 450,000 acre feet a year, ASO makes less sense than the San Joaquin River watershed where Millerton Lake can only store 540,000 acre feet and runoff can be three times that amount, Munn said.

“There are some spots where ASO makes sense, but it’s pretty expensive,” he said.

Where information from physical checks and scattered snow sensors is spotty, the ASO information can be an invaluable data bridge.

“It would be awesome data to have right now,” said Steve Haugen, watermaster for the Kings River when interviewed before the March storms. “We have 10 snow sensors in our watershed, which is a million acres. That’s not a lot of data points to draw some pretty big conclusions.”

The ASO information wouldn’t just help in dryer years, like this one, but it would be a huge help in potential flood years for dam operators to know how much water to expect and how fast.

“It’s beyond the research point,” Haugen said. “It’s ready to roll.”

He estimated it would cost $15 million a year for enough ASO flights to cover watersheds from Kern to Trinity.

So far, there haven’t been any successful attempts at funding legislation.

SJV Water is an independent, nonprofit news site dedicated to covering water in the San Joaquin Valley. Get inside access to SJV Water by becoming a member.


Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter & Get Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive INSTANT ALERTS of new articles and to be added to SJV Water’s WEEKLY NEWSLETTER