Irrigation water prices under SGMA causing sticker shock

February 6, 2020
by Lois Henry
Lois Henry

Sustainability Plan

CLICK HERE to read Rosedale-Rio Bravo’s groundwater sustainability plan.

 

Share This: 

Reaction was hushed when Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District General Manager Eric Averett asked the small group of farmers Tuesday morning if any were interested in buying irrigation water at the previously unheard of price of $770 an acre foot.

No papers rustled. Keyboards went silent. And none of the growers raised a hand.

Such is the shock farmers outside irrigation districts, which regularly buy surface supplies, are facing as the state’s new Sustainable Groundwater Management Act takes hold and groundwater pumping will be severely curtailed in the Central Valley.

“I don’t know if that’s wet year pricing or dry year pricing,” Averett continued. “The market is going to be volatile for the next few years.”

Averett explained that since Rosedale’s groundwater sustainability plan has been submitted to the state, the district is proceeding with its plan to help growers in the so-called “white lands” find water supplies.

White lands are areas in groundwater subbasins not covered by agricultural water districts, which charge their landowners assessments in order to pay for water contracts with the state or federal water systems or to buy water from other sellers. White land growers operate strictly on groundwater, which costs only as much as the energy used to bring it to the surface.

Under SGMA, white lands were required to come under the authority of districts or groundwater sustainability agencies in order to track and reduce their pumping.

Several white land growers were at Rosedale’s Tuesday meeting to update landowners about the SGMA process.

“The role Rosedale-Rio Bravo is taking on for the white lands, is the district can buy blocks of water and it goes into your accounts and you call on it whenever you need it to meet your water requirements,” Averett explained. “What I need from you is feedback that, if we buy this water at $770 an acre foot, is there any interest in this group to buy water at $750 or $800 an acre foot?”

“Not for row crops,” said George Cappello, a water specialist with carrot giant Grimmway Farms, which has a chunk of land along Stockdale Highway that’s outside of any water district.

The maximum Grimmway could pay would be $450 to $500 an acre foot and even that wouldn’t be sustainable for long, he said.

“If the choice is to fallow or buy $500 water, you can’t farm carrots on $500 water year in and year out,” Cappello said.

Averett understood the sticker shock but urged growers in the audience to consider two things:
One, their groundwater is essentially free so, when it’s averaged, $700-per-acre-foot or even $800-per-acre-foot water is actually closer to $200 per acre foot.

“The second thing is — that’s the market.”

Rosedale-Rio Bravo’s groundwater sustainability plan.

He predicted that after 10 years under SGMA, irrigation water at $800 an acre foot “will be a screamin’ deal.”

Under Rosedale’s groundwater plan, white lands will be allotted water in five-year increments as the district assess and strives to reduce demand. Averett said it makes sense to buy water now and front load each growers’ account then spread it out over time to “maintain your economic footprint.”

He also noted that if water comes available at lower prices, the Rosedale-Rio Bravo board would likely buy that cheaper water for its own district growers who do pay regular assessments.

“I will not be offering water to anyone else for anything less than $400 or $500,” he said. “So, a word of caution, the water market will likely be $700 or $800.”

Of course, availability and price depend on each year’s hydrology. Big water years equal lower prices.

The $770-per-acre foot water Rosedale mentioned is being offered by Buena Vista Water Storage District. Buena Vista sold water for about $800 an acre foot last winter, according to Board President John Vidovich.

“We priced the water based on what we thought the hydrology was last year. Then it was very, very wet, so we thought it was fair to give (the buyers) extra water,” he said. “We’re not out to gouge anyone, so we gave them double the water.”

So far this year, Vidovich said, the outlook is a little dry. The Department of Water Resources just announced it would only deliver 15 percent of contracted amounts based on the snow pack.

Even at $770 an acre foot, Vidovich said people have been calling daily since Buena Vista put the water up for sale in mid-January.

“We haven’t budged on the price.”

The water year is still young. There could be cheaper water to be had in the future.

“So it’s a gamble,” one grower said at Tuesday’s meeting.

“Well, yes,” Averett said. “But it’s your gamble.”

In the end, the growers asked for more details and all the associated costs with getting that $770-per-acre-foot water into their accounts.

SJV Water is an independent, nonprofit news site dedicated to covering water in the San Joaquin Valley. Get inside access to SJV Water by becoming a member.

Receive Notifications

Enter your email address to receive INSTANT ALERTS of new articles and to be added to SJV Water’s WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

NEWS SEARCH
Water Resources

Maven’s Notebook is an excellent daily accounting of California water happenings statewide.